Aug
17
“Open Source” is not the right term to use here, I know, but what I’m getting at is the same kind of philosophy applies. A cracker cracks software. He then either make the cracked software available for free over P2P (see the analogy?) or he tell others how he did it on some devious crack site… Almost like a Freshmeat for piracy, but with tons of pr0n pop-ups and malicious code… The cracker himself does not always benefit hugely from it other than having commercial software for free…
This article got some valid points! http://tlug.jp/articles/Windows_Is_Free The impact of piracy is far more damaging to the FSF and the Open Source community than what is realised! (Thanks Capdog on muti!)
If you start scrutinizing Microsoft Windows licences, you’ll see that there is ACTUALLY very, VERY little legal copies out in the market! I remeber a couple of years ago when I was working as a sys-admin, they nailed one of our customers due to the fact that some hardware components was replaced and Windows re-installed without re-purchasing a new licence. The fact that Microsoft does not cannot control it, actually is to their advantage! Talk about “guerilla marketing”… Hows that for a strategy!
Blogged with Flock
Tags: piracy, windows, microsoft, opensource, software
Sharing is caring:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Business, Open Source Stii
Apr
24
Don’t know why this has not yet been announced, but at last I’m one of the first for a change! Tyler Reed has joined the Cerebra boys! Congrats Tyler. By the looks of things, you are in for an exciting ride!
And more so, congrats Dave, Mike and Carl for getting Tyler! 
technorati tags:cerebra, tylerreed
Blogged with Flock
Sharing is caring:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Business Stii
Apr
24
Is Telkom joing the 2.0 scene? At first I thought so… I think they might be trying, but is busy failing dismally… They should really stop and maybe talk to the Cerebra boys before they consider doing so. Anyway, I came across this new “portal” Telom launched. (Thank you Digital Pilgrim!) Its a nice looking huge bandwidth munching flash animation. It is Telkom telling us how lucky we are having broadband and being able to do all sorts of stuff to generate them more money. Lets face it, everytime you watch a Youtube video, Telkom makes money. Every song you download from iTunes or wherever, Telkom makes money. They now went as far as actually encouraging you to do so, so they can make more money…
As much as I hate giving them any sort of publicity, I hate it more to keep quiet! So here goes:
Telkom launched its “do” portal. Its a portal mainly promoting Telkom products and how good they are and what all you can do with them. It totally sucks! Apparently you can register and download music and movies and what-not. I’m not even going to bother registering…
I feel like a conspiracy theorist saying this, but it all seems like they are now promoting that you should “kill your cap” so they can benefit a bit more…
Then another thing that bothers the crap out of me is those ads down the right-hand side. Is it paid for ads? If so, then I would appeal that we boicot iTunes, Youtube, Computicket, EA Gaming, Aardvark (not that I think boicotting aardvark is worth abything since nobody prolly uses them!), and a few others. How the hell can these companies support this evil monopoly?! Dissappointed I am… If it is not paid for advertising, I would like to urge these companies to sue the crap out of Telkom for the bad association they have caused!
Max, my friend, I’m with you on whatever you want to do to Telkom.
technorati tags:telkom, web2.0, hellkom, portal
Blogged with Flock
Sharing is caring:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Business, South Africa, Web 2.0 Stii
Apr
23
I feel sorry for our local ISP’s. How can they compete with their international counterparts when it comes to hosting of sites? It simply does not make sense! SA web sites are jumping ship (and we are following soon!) and moving to international hosts, and who can blame them? It makes zero business sense to host locally for R4000.00 when you can do so for more features and bandwidth internationally at R400.00! That is: You get more for 10% of the price. Either my maths sucks or ISP’s are being ripped off / is ripping us off.
Lets face it, ISP’s HAVE to charge what they do in order to simply SURVIVE. Hellkom makes it damn difficult for these guys to stay competitive! Bulk of our huge hosting fees goes for bandwidth and that they have to pay over to Hellkom again.
Paul over at Wired Gecko and Max is talking action against the monopoly that is Hellkom… I guess the best starting point is to rally up all the local ISP’s since they are the ones that is getting the smallest of the hind tits (at least when you talk hosting!). They are being forced to offer completely uncompetitive hosting fees, while you can get 10 x of what they offer for 10% of the prices they charge!
For connectivity we all pay dearly. We do not have many choices. For hosting we do have choices, and most of us do choose to exercise our freedom of choice by hosting on overseas servers. All-in-all, we are all getting screwed one way or another! I hate feeling screwed…
technorati tags:hosting, isp, hellkom, bandwidth
Blogged with Flock
Sharing is caring:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Business, South Africa Stii
Apr
03
Is hellopeter.com a fair service? Some guy on reporter.co.za wrote a complaint that he was listed on hellopeter.com for delivering bad service. Although he had the opportunity to set things straight there and then, he did not.
Hellopeter allows users to lay complaints against companies giving unsatisfactory service. BRILLIANT!!! Two huge problems though:
- If your company was listed there, in order for you to respond and explain your side of the story, you need to pay from R13 500 up to R60 000 to do so! That seems a bit unfair if you ask me.
- Claims of bad service do not get investigated. Also not so fair.
As the guy on reporter.co.za stated:
“Just imagine: you just started out with
your own company. Now everyone who has ever attempted starting his own
company will quickly point out to you how you need to stretch your
pennies when you are still establishing yourself. Then along comes your jealous neighbour
or even a competitor, sucks something out of his thumb and posts it on
hellopeter.com. Immediately you are set back at least R13 500 and
that’s excluding all the negative marketing you will have to put up
with.“
Now, we do NOT need something we cannot trust. If Peter Cheales would like to run a fair service “searching for service excellence” he need to either make it free altogether or he needs to fully and properly investigate claims before publishing them on the web site!
What bugs me is why did this Creationist guy that wrote on reporter.co.za not set the records straight? He had a brilliant opportunity to do so. Now he rather complains about Hellopeter instead of referencing the complain together with his reply. Simple and free!
technorati tags:hellopeter, customerservice, complaints
Blogged with Flock
Sharing is caring:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Business Stii
Mar
23
Max Kaizen quoted something Paul Graham said in a comment on the post “Who dictates the evolution of the web?” that is very interesting. Its a long post, but worth the read:
Tim says the phrase “Web 2.0″ first arose in “a brainstormingsession between O’Reilly and Medialive International.” What is Medialive International? “Producers of technology tradeshows and conferences,” according to their site. So presumably that’s what this brainstorming session was about. O’Reilly wanted to organize aconference about the web, and they were wondering what to call it.
I don’t think there was any deliberate plan to suggest there was a new version of the web. They just wanted to make the point that the web mattered again. It was a kind of semantic deficit spending: they knew new things were coming, and the “2.0″ referred to whatever those might turn out to be.
And they were right. New things were coming. But the new version number led to some awkwardness in the short term. In the process of developing the pitch for the first conference, someone must have decided they’d better take a stab at explaining what that “2.0″referred to. Whatever it meant, “the web as a platform” was at least not too constricting.
The story about “Web 2.0″ meaning the web as a platform didn’t live much past the first conference. By the second conference, what “Web 2.0″ seemed to mean was something about democracy. At least, it did when people wrote about it online. The conference itself didn’t seem very grassroots. It cost $2800, so the only people who could afford to go were VCs and people from big companies.
And yet, oddly enough, Ryan Singel’s article about the conference in Wired News spoke of “throngs of geeks.” When a friend of mine asked Ryan about this, it was news to him. He said he’d originally written something like “throngs of VCs and biz dev guys” but had later shortened it just to “throngs,” and that this must have in turn been expanded by the editors into “throngs of geeks.” After all, a Web 2.0 conference would presumably be full of geeks, right?
Well, no. There were about 7. Even Tim O’Reilly was wearing a suit, a sight so alien I couldn’t parse it at first. I saw him walk by and said to one of the O’Reilly people “that guy looks just like Tim.”
“Oh, that’s Tim. He bought a suit.” I ran after him, and sure enough, it was. He explained that he’d just bought it in Thailand.
The 2005 Web 2.0 conference reminded me of Internet trade shows during the Bubble, full of prowling VCs looking for the next hot startup. There was that same odd atmosphere created by a large number of people determined not to miss out. Miss out on what? They didn’t know. Whatever was going to happen—whatever Web 2.0 turned out to be.
I read another interesting thing Tim O’Reilly said a while ago when he was asked to give advice for 2007. The heading reads “Put yourself at the center of the action” It is taken out of Intelligence Magazine - the February 2007 edition. I’m not re-typing the entire article. Only the first two of his six points.
1. Be first
This is one of the immutable laws of marketing. Who was the first person to fly across the Atlantic? Lindbergh. Who was the second? No Idea.
2. If you cannot be first, create a new category so you can be first.
Who was the first woman to fly across the Atlantic? Amelia Earhart. New category. We did not have the first Web conference out there, but when we applied “Web2.0″ to the category, we created something new.
Although I’m pretty sure it was not the only reason why the term Web2.0 was created, it sure is a major reason! Interesting…
technorati tags:web2.0, marketing, business
Blogged with Flock
Sharing is caring:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Business, Marketing, Web 2.0 Stii
Mar
15
The dangerous duo is at it again… Get the new episode of Amplitude fresh off the shelve hot from the oven. An interesting chat with Eric Edelstein! And talking about the email SPAM thing, we all received the one from Mr Ramon Thomas. Stefano certainly give him a good indication of what he thinks…
technorati tags:podcast, amplitude
Blogged with Flock
Sharing is caring:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Blogging, Business, Marketing Stii
